Star Journal

Top Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe

Main Menu

  • Local
    • News
    • Business
    • Schools
    • Law & Order
    • Arts & Ent
    • Wedding Planner
    • Viewpoint
    • Sports
      • Sports News
      • High School Sports Scores
  • Covid 19
  • Outdoors
  • Wellness
  • Classifieds
  • Obits
  • Lake View
  • Northwoods NOW
  • Living On The Lake
  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe

logo

Star Journal

  • Local
    • News
    • Business
    • Schools
    • Law & Order
    • Arts & Ent
    • Wedding Planner
    • Viewpoint
    • Sports
      • Sports News
      • High School Sports Scores
  • Covid 19
  • Outdoors
  • Wellness
  • Classifieds
  • Obits
  • Lake View
  • Northwoods NOW
  • Living On The Lake
Law & OrderNews
Home›Local›Law & Order›Prosecution and defense present closing arguments in Mendez murder trial

Prosecution and defense present closing arguments in Mendez murder trial

By StarJournal
April 25, 2019
2054
0
Share:

By Lori C. Adler
Star Journal Reporter

Both District Attorney Michael Schiek and Peter Pruzinski, attorney for the defense, presented their closing arguments Wednesday, the final day of the Mendez murder trial. Robin Mendez is accused of the murder of wife, Barbara Mendez, in Minocqua in 1982.

District Attorney Michael Schiek presents his closing argument during the final day of the Mendez murder trial.

Schiek went through each and every witness testimony before Judge Jill Falstad, outlining what the state believes to be the timeline of events leading up to the murder. Schiek pointed out key elements to how the victim was found, including “no defensive wounds” on her body and “no disorganization that would indicate a struggle.” He noted that, while some money was reported missing at the credit union where Barbara Mendez worked and was found dead, over $17,000 was left in the safe, and the victim’s purse was still under her desk. Schiek also described how Shari Anderson, a close friend of Barbara, testified that Barbara told her the day before her murder that she was concerned about the relationship her husband was having with 14-year-old Jodi (Lensert) Rolloff and planned to confront her husband that evening.  This is the reason for Barbara’s murder, Schiek hypothesized, stating “the motive is the disclosure of the sexual assault of Jodi.”

Schiek noted that, though circumstantial, there are 75 pieces of evidence plus the confession to two inmates who were celled with Mendez for a short time following his arrest in February 2018. The inmates claimed in recorded interviews that Mendez told them he had killed his wife. “That’s an admission, Judge,” Schiek insisted.

Pruzinski outlined several theories regarding the murder that he felt cast reasonable doubt of Mendez committing the crime, stating simply, “Robin Mendez is a sex offender, not a murderer.”

Defense Attorney Peter Pruzinski hopes to demonstrate reasonable doubt of Mendez’s involvement in the murder during his closing statement.

A robbery gone wrong was Pruzinski’s main hypothesis. “It’s absolutely a common sense reason that this was a robbery,” adding that “the evidence best fits Thomas Boze. Pruzinski alleges Boze entered the credit union that evening with plans to commit robbery, but the robbery went wrong, which is why, Pruzinski concludes, some of the money remained.

As for the admission of guilt to the two inmates, Pruzinski explained that these two individuals were put in the same cell as someone accused of murder, and exclaimed, “What does that say about them?” Pointing out that it is known that inmates often have strong feelings about child sex offenders, Pruzinski went on to say that these inmates may have had a bias toward Mendez for that reason. In addition, one of the inmates, Pruzinski states, has a tattoo of the emblem of a white supremacy group, and Mendez has a Hispanic name. “All that bears on their credibility,” Pruzinski adds.

Following closing arguments from both the prosecution and the defense, court was adjourned to allow Judge Falstad time to deliberate. A ruling on the case is expected next Tuesday, April 30, at 1:00 p.m.

Tags1982 murderBarbara MendezMendez murder trialRobin Mendez
Previous Article

Full-time scammers target part-time job seekers

Next Article

Long-time Rhinelander businessman Marv Schumacher passes away

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Law & Order

    Minocqua man to be charged with wife’s 1982 murder

    February 6, 2018
    By StarJournal
  • Law & OrderNews

    Robin Mendez trial begins Thursday

    April 8, 2019
    By StarJournal
  • Latest NewsLaw & OrderLocal

    Mendez is guilty as charged; Judge rules the state has met its burden of proof

    April 30, 2019
    By StarJournal
  • FeaturedLatest NewsLocalNews

    Robin Mendez sentenced to life in prison

    July 24, 2019
    By StarJournal
  • Latest NewsLaw & OrderLocalNews

    Mendez trial begins with opening statements, daughters’ testimonies

    April 12, 2019
    By StarJournal
  • Law & Order

    “Cold Justice” provides assistance in Mendez case

    February 8, 2018
    By StarJournal

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Us


Star Journal is published by Multi Media Channels LLC, N2919 County Road QQ Waupaca, WI 54981.

Timeline

  • January 19, 2021

    Vaccines for ages 65+ to be offered beginning next week

  • January 19, 2021

    Shortcuts to Comfort

  • January 19, 2021

    Check it Out at RDL: Take advantage of curbside services

  • January 19, 2021

    Habitat for Humanity hosts online auction

  • January 19, 2021

    Obituary: Joan Erlitz

Find us on Facebook

  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe
Copyright © 2020 Multi Media Channels LLC.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted without the prior written consent of Multi Media Channels LLC.
×