Star Journal

Top Menu

  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe

Main Menu

  • Local
    • News
    • Business
    • Schools
    • Law & Order
    • Arts & Ent
    • Wedding Planner
    • Viewpoint
    • Sports
      • Sports News
      • High School Sports Scores
  • Covid 19
  • Outdoors
  • Wellness
  • Classifieds
    • View Ads
    • Place Ads
  • Our Legals
    • Legal Ads
    • Statewide
  • Obits
  • Lake View
  • Northwoods NOW
  • Living On The Lake
  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe

logo

Star Journal

  • Local
    • News
    • Business
    • Schools
    • Law & Order
    • Arts & Ent
    • Wedding Planner
    • Viewpoint
    • Sports
      • Sports News
      • High School Sports Scores
  • Covid 19
  • Outdoors
  • Wellness
  • Classifieds
    • View Ads
    • Place Ads
  • Our Legals
    • Legal Ads
    • Statewide
  • Obits
  • Lake View
  • Northwoods NOW
  • Living On The Lake
LocalNews
Home›Local›Board backs double certification for county forests

Board backs double certification for county forests

By Star Journal
October 18, 2016
793
0
Share:

New full-time county forester also approved

BY KEVIN BONESKE

REPORTER/PHOTOGRAPHER

Timber harvested from forests owned by Oneida County will have dual certification in the future under a resolution approved Tuesday by the County Board.

County forest director John Bilogan said the main benefit of including the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification, which has been requested by several local mills, along with the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) certification the county has been a participant of since January 2005, would be for those mills to sell FSC-certified products.

“There will be an additional workload on our department getting up to speed (on FSC certification) – largely paperwork,” Bilogan said. “We have a 15-year plan that we operate under, which many parts of it will have to be amended and brought to the County Board for approval.”

Bilogan said the differences “shouldn’t be that great” between handling certification with FSC and SFI, “although there are some differences.”

“I think people would view FSC as slightly more restrictive, slightly more conservative of the two groups,” he said. “Initially, many years ago – I guess it was 10 or 12 years ago when certification first came to the state of Wisconsin, the County Forest Association – we opted into SFI, largely because at the time, the industry was promoting that particular certification entity as the one of choice for the industry.

“But over the years, apparently things have changed. Not that there’s still not an interest in SFI, but apparently there’s more of a thrust for FSC.”

The resolution notes that the “direct costs of forest certification” are to be paid by the state Department of Natural Resources, which manages the forestland in partnership with the county, though if that doesn’t happen the matter of participation in the forest certification programs would be brought back to the county Forestry, Land and Recreation Committee and/or the County Board for reconsideration.

All 16 supervisors present out of the 21 on the County Board also backed a resolution to hire a new full-time forester position effective Jan. 1.

The resolution notes the county has had difficulty since 2012 with hiring and retaining a forester as a limited-term employee (LTE) and that it also would be in the best interest of the forestry department to have a staff member cross-trained in the development of additional miles of motorized trails, for which there has been an increase of public requests.

County human resources director Lisa Charbarneau said the fiscal impact statement for the new forester position takes into account the Administration Committee increasing the budget revenue line item for the forestry department and also removed the LTE money from the budget.

“The fiscal impact before you looks pretty pleasant, actually, when you look at the numbers before you,” she said.

Based on the “Grade Level H,” the fiscal impact of the position in 2017 for wages and benefits would range from $63,653 at “Step 1” to $69,537 at “Step 6.” However, given the $34,194 that would have been available for LTE positions and additional revenue factored in, the estimated additional cost would be $2,937 at Step 1 and $6,369 at Step 6 with public charges for stumpage revenue being the funding source.

TagsFeaturedOneida County BoardOneida County forests
Previous Article

Courthouse troubles linked to severe weather

Next Article

GIRLS VOLLEYBALL: Hodags’ season ends in D2 ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Business

    Letting go is key

    February 5, 2015
    By StarJournal
  • Arts & EntMultimediaPhoto GalleryVideo

    The Rainforest comes to Rhinelander

    April 27, 2015
    By StarJournal
  • Latest NewsLocalNews

    The Seed Library

    April 27, 2015
    By StarJournal
  • LocalNewsOutdoors

    High risk of fire

    May 3, 2015
    By StarJournal
  • Schools

    Careers on Wheels: Students learn what makes these careers go ’round and ’round

    May 11, 2015
    By StarJournal
  • Latest News

    Rhinelander Fans in the Stands

    May 11, 2015
    By StarJournal

Leave a reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Us


Star Journal is published by Multi Media Channels LLC, N2919 County Road QQ Waupaca, WI 54981.

  • Contact Us
  • Hodag Star Journal E-Edition
  • Subscribe
Copyright © 2020 Multi Media Channels LLC.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted without the prior written consent of Multi Media Channels LLC.
×